11 Responses to our chemistry

1. Susan L Daniels says:

   June 2, 2012 at 11:41 pm

   A more experimental (no pun intended–really) piece for me
2. Kyle says:

   June 2, 2012 at 11:50 pm

   fantastic, intelligent and witty and sweet
   • Susan L Daniels says:

     June 2, 2012 at 11:52 pm

     Thanks Kyle–I see you also wrote about drips on your blog–must say yours were a bit more volatile than these–I liked.
     • Kyle says:

       June 2, 2012 at 11:57 pm

       lol and a bit more visceral – thank you
       • Susan L Daniels says:

         June 3, 2012 at 12:04 am

         🙂 guess I’m too chicken to comment on that one!
3. doncarroll says:

   June 2, 2012 at 11:50 pm

   i really like the use of the flask in this one. great idea to work with. you worked it out superbly…:)
   • Susan L Daniels says:

     June 2, 2012 at 11:51 pm

     Thanks so much, Don

     A little more sparse than my usual, but I like this one 🙂
4. nelle says:

   June 3, 2012 at 4:12 am

   Hmmmm… captured yet wishes to escape.
   • Susan L Daniels says:

     June 3, 2012 at 5:41 am

     Ah–didn’t really see the longing to escape until you mentioned it–good take! It’s so there…
5. Noel Ihebuzor says:

   June 3, 2012 at 4:44 am

   wow! Nice>Breathing>>Alive>>>Electric>>>>Powerful! One senses all the sciences converging here! Great poem, Susan!
   • Susan L Daniels says:

     June 3, 2012 at 5:44 am

     Thanks much. A little less padded than my usual language (more distilled, perhaps?), but I liked the flow–glad you enjoyed.

Comments are closed.